Philip A. Dennis
- Molecular Biology
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Oncology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Edward T. HallGuillermo Bonfil BatallaJohn BrognardOlli SakselaDaniel B. RifkinP C HarpelKlaudiusz GrübelStanisław Wacławek
- Topics
- Historical Studies in Central America (6 papers)Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (3 papers)Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cultural StudiesHistoryCommunication
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Oncology
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Philip A. Dennis
37 papers receiving 941 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Molecular Biology 264
- Sociology and Political Science 167
- Oncology 132
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 119
- Plant Science 70
Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Dennis
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Dennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Dennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Dennis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Dennis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Dennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Dennis. The network helps show where Philip A. Dennis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip A. Dennis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip A. Dennis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip A. Dennis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip A. Dennis. Philip A. Dennis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Grisi siknis entre los miskitos | 0 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 118 | |
| 11 | Literature and anthropology | 12 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 207 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Conflictos por tierras en el valle de Oaxaca | 6 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip A. Dennis
Philip A. Dennis is a scholar working on History, Oncology and Development, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Central America (6 papers), Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean (3 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (61 citations), History (67 citations) and Communication (40 citations). Philip A. Dennis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Edward T. Hall, Guillermo Bonfil Batalla, John Brognard, Olli Saksela, Daniel B. Rifkin, P C Harpel, Klaudiusz Grübel, Stanisław Wacławek, Vinod V.T. Padil and Miroslav Černík. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.