P.G. Jansen

2.4k citations
3 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 2

Impact in

Papers in

P.G. Jansen

3 papers receiving 1.4k citations

P.G. Jansen's Hit Papers

Business Research Methods 2003 · 1.5k citations
1.5k0+7+15Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

P.G. Jansen
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 324
  • Information Systems and Management 177
  • Business and International Management 48
  • Strategy and Management 351
  • Marketing 210
Replace M. van de Velde with:
M. van de Velde Belgium
Pamela S. Schindler United States
Tesfatsion Sahlu Desta South Africa
Roger Hussey United Kingdom
M. R. Anusree India
Céline Rojon United Kingdom
Phil Johnson United Kingdom
Roger Bougie
Donald A. Wehrung Canada
Marguerite Schneider United States
P.G. Jansen relative to M. van de Velde Belgium M. van de Velde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. van de Velde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.G. Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.G. Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.G. Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.G. Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.G. Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.G. Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.G. Jansen. The network helps show where P.G. Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside P.G. Jansen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.G. Jansen Line = papers co-authored together P.G. Jansen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
#Work
1
Business Research Methods
Hit paper breakdown →
20031533
2
The Longitudinal Effect of Information Seeking on Socialisation and Development in Three Organisations: Filling the Research Gaps
20054
3 19861

About P.G. Jansen

P.G. Jansen is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 3 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (1 paper), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper) and Numerical Methods and Algorithms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (324 citations), Information Systems and Management (177 citations), Business and International Management (48 citations), Strategy and Management (351 citations) and Marketing (210 citations). P.G. Jansen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nate Anderson, M. van de Velde, P. Weidner and Mandy E.G. van der Velde. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact