Peter W. Edbury
- History top 1%
- Classics top 2%
- Archeology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James M. PowellLeah ShopkowAnthony LuttrellMalcolm BarberJonathan Riley‐SmithMaya Shatzmiller
- Topics
- Medieval History and Crusades (23 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (20 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (18 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryArcheology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewHistory of European Ideas
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter W. Edbury
27 papers receiving 128 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- History 108
- Classics 88
- Archeology 66
- Sociology and Political Science 54
- Anthropology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Edbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Edbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Edbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Edbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Edbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Edbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Edbury. The network helps show where Peter W. Edbury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter W. Edbury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter W. Edbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter W. Edbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter W. Edbury. Peter W. Edbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | The Last Lusignans (1432-1489): A political history | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Philip of Novara: Le livre de forme de plait [Critical edition and translation] | 0 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | John of Ibelin: le livre des assises | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Fighting for the faith and caring for the sick | 0 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | Crusade and settlement : papers read at the First Conference of the Society for the Study of Crusades and the Latin East and presented to R.C. Smail | 10 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Peter W. Edbury
Peter W. Edbury is a scholar working on Classics, History and Archeology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval History and Crusades (23 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (20 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (88 citations), History (108 citations) and Archeology (66 citations). Peter W. Edbury has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include James M. Powell, Leah Shopkow, Anthony Luttrell, Malcolm Barber, Jonathan Riley‐Smith and Maya Shatzmiller. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and History of European Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.