Peter T. Murphy
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 14
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 6
-
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 21
- Co-authors
- Romas J. Kazlauskas (11 shared papers)Robert J. Wells (9 shared papers)Ronald J. Quinn (5 shared papers)RJ Wells (3 shared papers)Rymantas Kazlauskas (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Evans (2 shared papers)Peter Schönholzer (2 shared papers)Mary J. Garson (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (14 papers)Studies in Romanticism (3 papers)ELH (2 papers)Carbohydrate Research (2 papers)Journal of Natural Products (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Peter T. Murphy
35 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Biotechnology 466
- Pharmacology 261
- Organic Chemistry 313
- Anatomy 15
- Cancer Research 128
Countries citing papers authored by Peter T. Murphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter T. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter T. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter T. Murphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter T. Murphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter T. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter T. Murphy. The network helps show where Peter T. Murphy may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter T. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 55 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 55 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 38 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 22 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1971 | 21 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 14 |
About Peter T. Murphy
Peter T. Murphy is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 39 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (21 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (14 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (466 citations), Pharmacology (261 citations), Organic Chemistry (313 citations), Anatomy (15 citations) and Cancer Research (128 citations). Peter T. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Romas J. Kazlauskas, Robert J. Wells, Ronald J. Quinn, RJ Wells, Rymantas Kazlauskas, Elizabeth Evans, Peter Schönholzer, Mary J. Garson, Christopher N. Battershill and J. E. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Studies in Romanticism, ELH, Carbohydrate Research and Journal of Natural Products.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.