Andrew Heaton

26 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Andrew Heaton
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Biotechnology 137
  • Modeling and Simulation 61
  • Aging 8
  • Ecology 103
  • Physiology 17
Replace GM König with:
GM König Germany
Federico Buonanno Italy
Claudio Ortenzi Italy
Külliki Varvas Estonia
Gilles Barnathan France
Anne‐Marie Genevière France
Daniela Giordano Italy
Reet Koljak Estonia
Gian Paolo Rossini Italy
Fei Gan China
Andrew Heaton relative to GM König Germany GM König's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
GM König · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Heaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Heaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Heaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Heaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Heaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Heaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Heaton. The network helps show where Andrew Heaton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Heaton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Heaton Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Heaton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994116
2 198763
3 199551
4 201736
5 198929
6 200726
7 201621
8 198520
9 199816
10 201813
11 199713
12 201610
13 201810
14 20168
15 19878
16 20207
17 20176
18 20185
19 20214
20
Assessment of a self-deferral form for screening blood donors, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand.
20084

About Andrew Heaton

Andrew Heaton is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 28 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (6 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (5 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (5 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers), Leech Biology and Applications (2 papers), Marine animal studies overview (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (137 citations), Modeling and Simulation (61 citations), Aging (8 citations), Ecology (103 citations) and Physiology (17 citations). Andrew Heaton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Tajikistan. Frequent co-authors include John C. Coll, BF Bowden, Richard H. Willis, Paul J. Scheuer, Mauro Maida, Russell C. Babcock, Richard L. Miller, GM König, Rocky de Nys and M. N. Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Marine Biology, Chelonian Conservation and Biology and Australian Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact