Peter Stütz

513 citations
67 papers · 275 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Stütz

53 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Peter Stütz
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 56
  • Aerospace Engineering 132
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 102
  • Media Technology 41
  • Instrumentation 11
Replace Linda Senigagliesi with:
Linda Senigagliesi Italy
Li Fan China
Christoph Bodensteiner Germany
Jean-Charles Noyer France
Yu-Jhe Li United States
Franz Andert Germany
Sixing Hu Singapore
Guilherme V. Cavalheiro United States
Peter Stütz relative to Linda Senigagliesi Italy Linda Senigagliesi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.7×
Linda Senigagliesi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stütz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stütz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stütz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stütz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stütz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stütz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stütz. The network helps show where Peter Stütz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stütz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stütz Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stütz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199658
2 202227
3
Airborne sensor and perception management: A conceptual approach for surveillance UAS
201217
4 202310
5 201910
6 20238
7 20206
8 20236
9 20226
10 20156
11 20235
12 20215
13
Application of a probabilistic market-based approach in UAV sensor & perception management
20135
14 20225
15 20195
16 19815
17 20235
18 19944
19 20244
20 20224

About Peter Stütz

Peter Stütz is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Engineering and Media Technology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (20 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (15 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (13 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (12 papers), Remote-Sensing Image Classification (8 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (8 papers), UAV Applications and Optimization (7 papers) and Air Traffic Management and Optimization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (56 citations), Aerospace Engineering (132 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (102 citations), Media Technology (41 citations) and Instrumentation (11 citations). Peter Stütz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Venezuela and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include C Gerber, Martin Ruß, Simon Koch, Matthias Gerdts, Marc Schmitt, Gerhard Schulz, Bernhard Krach, Emanuel Gautier, Kapa Prasad and Pau Climent-Pérez. Their work appears in journals such as Drones, Sensors, Remote Sensing, Injury and Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact