ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · 1×
×3.212k/4kAE
×0.6562/972SPS
×0.32k/7kGEOLO
×1.38k/6kCVPR
×0.34k/15kEE
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Drones
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Drones. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Drones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Drones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Drones.
About Drones
The 2.8k papers published in Drones in the last decades have received a total of 28.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Drones usually cover Aerospace Engineering (1.6k papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (950 papers) and Geology (238 papers) specifically the topics of UAV Applications and Optimization (806 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (577 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (468 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (386 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (293 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (238 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (192 papers) and Advanced Neural Network Applications (188 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Drones are Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo, Zhengxin Zhang, Muhammad Asghar Khan, Paulo R. Ferreira, Tauã M. Cabreira, Lisane Brisolara, Mohammed H. Alsharif, Fazal Noor, Insaf Ullah and Hanno Hildmann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.