Ching‐Pong Mak
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthesis of β-Lactam Compounds 8
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 4
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions 3
- Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry 2
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 2
- Toxicology top 10%
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 2
- Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds 2
-
- Xenotransplantation and immune response 2
- Co-authors
- George BuechiL. A. OchrymowyczWilna J. MoreeChi‐Huey WongPhil B. AlperHans FliriStephen HanessianG. Büchi
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (2 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaSwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
Ching‐Pong Mak
23 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Organic Chemistry 301
- Toxicology 20
- Pharmacology 34
- Process Chemistry and Technology 10
- Biochemistry 23
Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Pong Mak
This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Pong Mak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Pong Mak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Pong Mak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Pong Mak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Pong Mak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Pong Mak. The network helps show where Ching‐Pong Mak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Pong Mak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1983 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1978 | 25 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 65 | |
| 19 | 1977 | 42 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 68 |
About Ching‐Pong Mak
Ching‐Pong Mak is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis of β-Lactam Compounds (8 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers), Xenotransplantation and immune response (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (301 citations), Toxicology (20 citations) and Pharmacology (34 citations). Ching‐Pong Mak has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include George Buechi, L. A. Ochrymowycz, Wilna J. Moree, Chi‐Huey Wong, Phil B. Alper, Hans Fliri, Stephen Hanessian, G. Büchi, Ernst Küsters and Ying Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.