Peter Šemrl

168 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Peter Šemrl
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Algebra and Number Theory 2.7k
  • Mathematical Physics 1.6k
  • Applied Mathematics 1.7k
  • Geometry and Topology 1.2k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.1k
Replace John F. R. Duncan with:
John F. R. Duncan United States
Edward G. Effros United States
Carl Pearcy United States
Nicholas M. Katz United States
A. Pełczyński Poland
Robert Lazarsfeld United States
É. B. Vinberg Russia
Claudio Procesi Italy
Frits Beukers Netherlands
George M. Bergman United States
Peter Šemrl relative to John F. R. Duncan United States John F. R. Duncan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John F. R. Duncan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Šemrl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Šemrl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Šemrl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Šemrl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Šemrl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Šemrl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Šemrl. The network helps show where Peter Šemrl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Šemrl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Šemrl Line = papers co-authored together Peter Šemrl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 172 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992295
2 1993157
3 1997132
4 1993109
5 1993104
6 199986
7 200085
8 199083
9 199577
10 199670
11 199663
12 199059
13 199157
14 199252
15 199349
16 199449
17 199948
18 200747
19 199945
20 199344

About Peter Šemrl

Peter Šemrl is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 172 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topics in Algebra (137 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (79 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (40 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (39 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (33 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (25 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (12 papers) and Advanced Banach Space Theory (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (2.7k citations), Mathematical Physics (1.6k citations), Applied Mathematics (1.7k citations), Geometry and Topology (1.2k citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.1k citations). Peter Šemrl has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matej Brešar, Themistocles M. Rassias, Matjaž Omladič, Th. M. Rassias, Chi-Kwong Li, Lajos Molnár, Rajendra Bhatia, Roman Ger, Leiba Rodman and Rajendra Bhatia. Their work appears in journals such as Linear Algebra and its Applications, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Algebra, Studia Mathematica and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact