Peter Prescott

15 papers receiving 154 citations

Peers

Peter Prescott
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Law 33
  • Clinical Psychology 52
  • Marketing 24
  • General Psychology 3
  • Sociology and Political Science 87
Replace Frances P. Bernat with:
Frances P. Bernat United States
David S. Tanenhaus United States
Matthew Silberman United States
Marci A. Hamilton United States
Margaret Vandiver United States
Moa Bursell Sweden
Avital Mentovich United States
Gabrielle Poeschl Portugal
Esther Madriz United States
Charles J. Ogletree United States
Peter Prescott relative to Frances P. Bernat United States Frances P. Bernat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Frances P. Bernat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Prescott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Prescott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Prescott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Prescott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Prescott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Prescott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Prescott. The network helps show where Peter Prescott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Prescott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Prescott Line = papers co-authored together Peter Prescott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
The child savers
1981118
2
The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs
200029
3 200917
4
INTENSIVE GROUP TREATMENT OF OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER: A PILOT STUDY
201315
5 202011
6
The modern law of copyright
19805
7 20223
8
A world of our own : notes on life and learning in a boys' preparatory school
19702
9 20242
10 20241
11 20221
12 19911
13 19951
14 20191
15
Encounters with American Culture: Volume 1, 1963-1972
20051
16
The cape of not much hope
19940
17 20170

About Peter Prescott

Peter Prescott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Marketing, Artificial Intelligence and Law, having authored 17 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Copyright and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Regional resilience and development (2 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (1 paper), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Digital Rights Management and Security (1 paper) and Spaceflight effects on biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (52 citations), Marketing (24 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (87 citations). Peter Prescott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arild Opheim, Jennifer L. Rice, Sven Andréasson, Audun Havnen, Elisabeth Haug, Bjarne Hansen, Gerd Kvale, Anne Lake Prescott, Raymond E. West and Victor Chien‐Chia Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Law Review, Circulation, Temperature, ˜The œjournal of regional analysis & policy and Studies in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact