Peter Oppenheimer

1.4k citations
55 papers · 879 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Oppenheimer

48 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Peter Oppenheimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 173
  • Finance 85
  • Family Practice 17
  • Otorhinolaryngology 33
  • Economics and Econometrics 195
Replace Robert T. Chang with:
Robert T. Chang United States
Álvaro Silva Portugal
Rolf Ziegler Germany
Αναστάσιος Πετρόπουλος Greece
Celia Chen Australia
Kip Smith United States
William Morrison United Kingdom
Ingrid Ott Germany
David Bachman United States
Shuhe Li China
Peter Oppenheimer relative to Robert T. Chang United States Robert T. Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Robert T. Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Oppenheimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Oppenheimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Oppenheimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Oppenheimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Oppenheimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Oppenheimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Oppenheimer. The network helps show where Peter Oppenheimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Oppenheimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Oppenheimer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Oppenheimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20202
2 201623
3 201319
4 20102
5 20083
6 200736
7 200479
8 200225
9 20020
10
Russia’s Post-Communist Economy
20015
11 20008
12
Frequency Space Correlation Between REITs and Capital Market Indices
19982
13 19925
14 19902
15 19901
16
The Artificial Menagerie.
19874
17 19815
18
Non-traded Goods and the Balance of Payments: A Historical Note
197414
19 196711
20 19636

About Peter Oppenheimer

Peter Oppenheimer is a scholar working on General Energy, Otorhinolaryngology, Finance, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Family Practice, having authored 55 papers that have together received 879 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers) and Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (173 citations), Finance (85 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (33 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (195 citations). Peter Oppenheimer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard Baldwin, Suzanne Weghorst, Peter Wilson, Robert Sweet, Timothy M. Kowalewski, Terry Grissom, Charles V. Edmond, Richard M. Satava, Frederick R. Stahr and Yen‐Ling Lee. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, National Institute Economic Review, The Journal of Portfolio Management, International Affairs and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026