Peter Oakes

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Oakes
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 377
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 216
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 324
  • Occupational Therapy 64
  • Safety Research 122
Replace Eleanor Ross with:
Eleanor Ross South Africa
James Hogg United Kingdom
Simon Whitaker United Kingdom
Alison Alborz United Kingdom
Scott Spreat United States
Kiyoshi Yamaki United States
Christine Linehan Ireland
Nigel Beail United Kingdom
Juan Bornman South Africa
Ashok Roy United Kingdom
Peter Oakes relative to Eleanor Ross South Africa Eleanor Ross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Eleanor Ross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Oakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Oakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Oakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Oakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Oakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Oakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Oakes. The network helps show where Peter Oakes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Oakes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Oakes Line = papers co-authored together Peter Oakes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001297
2
Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006
2006228
3 201387
4 200668
5 200368
6
The impact of person centred planning.
200558
7 200645
8 200838
9 200735
10 201635
11 200733
12 199529
13 199625
14 200822
15 200820
16 200318
17 200512
18 201211
19 20179
20
Rome in the Bible and The early Church
20029

About Peter Oakes

Peter Oakes is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology, Religious studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (13 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (5 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (4 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (377 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (216 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (324 citations), Occupational Therapy (64 citations) and Safety Research (122 citations). Peter Oakes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and Zambia. Frequent co-authors include Miriam Silver, Eric Emerson, Martin Routledge, Martín Knapp, Barbara McIntosh, Chris Hatton, Renée Romeo, Emma Krinjen‐Kemp, Paul Swift and Caroline White. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, Journal for the Study of the New Testament, The Journal of Adult Protection and Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact