Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Education top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Communication top 2%
- Co-authors
- Sonia LivingstoneGwyther ReesMariya StoilovaJasmina ByrneAntonius J. van RooijOrsolya KirályMark D. GriffithsVladan Starčević
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers)Social Media and Politics (2 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human BehaviorJournal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryNature Human Behaviour
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNigerIndia
In The Last Decade
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
9 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 1.8k
- Education 761
- Clinical Psychology 544
- Applied Psychology 358
- Communication 284
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. The network helps show where Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther. Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder | 1 |
| 6 | 105 | |
| 7 | 174 | |
| 8 | A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet usebreakdown → | 1441 |
| 9 | 181 |
About Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther
Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (358 citations), Communication (284 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.8k citations). Daniel Kardefelt‐Winther has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Niger and India. Frequent co-authors include Sonia Livingstone, Gwyther Rees, Mariya Stoilova, Jasmina Byrne, Antonius J. van Rooij, Orsolya Király, Mark D. Griffiths, Vladan Starčević and Zsolt Demetrovics. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Nature Human Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.