Peter McLeod

5.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
53 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Peter McLeod is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter McLeod has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter McLeod's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (9 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers). Peter McLeod is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (9 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers). Peter McLeod collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Peter McLeod's co-authors include Michael F. Land, Fernand Gobet, Merim Bilalić, Zoltán Dienes, Jon Driver, Navindra Persaud, Alan Cowey, Nick Reed, Edmund T. Rolls and Kim Plunkett and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Neuroscience and Annual Review of Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Peter McLeod

52 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter McLeod United Kingdom 31 2.1k 764 695 599 337 53 3.4k
Claudia Carello United States 36 3.4k 1.6× 846 1.1× 1.7k 2.4× 793 1.3× 148 0.4× 121 4.6k
Claire F. Michaels Netherlands 33 2.4k 1.1× 737 1.0× 1.2k 1.7× 366 0.6× 103 0.3× 85 3.2k
Stephen R. Mitroff United States 34 1.9k 0.9× 497 0.7× 713 1.0× 845 1.4× 322 1.0× 117 3.3k
M. T. Turvey United States 32 3.3k 1.6× 605 0.8× 1.7k 2.4× 477 0.8× 140 0.4× 59 4.4k
Robert E. Shaw United States 26 1.2k 0.6× 478 0.6× 645 0.9× 548 0.9× 352 1.0× 76 3.2k
James C. Johnston United States 36 5.5k 2.6× 989 1.3× 1.2k 1.7× 1.7k 2.9× 400 1.2× 91 7.1k
A. T. Welford United States 25 2.5k 1.2× 587 0.8× 1.0k 1.4× 715 1.2× 97 0.3× 80 4.3k
Thomas H. Carr United States 36 4.4k 2.1× 2.9k 3.9× 1.3k 1.8× 1.8k 3.1× 180 0.5× 79 7.3k
Margaret Jean Intons-Peterson United States 16 2.2k 1.0× 746 1.0× 614 0.9× 1.0k 1.7× 185 0.5× 38 3.3k
Peter A. Frensch Germany 39 2.5k 1.2× 1.7k 2.2× 1.0k 1.5× 1.2k 2.0× 129 0.4× 114 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McLeod. The network helps show where Peter McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter McLeod

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter McLeod. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter McLeod based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter McLeod. Peter McLeod is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ferguson, A, et al.. (2025). Exploiting Unstructured Sparsity in Fully Homomorphic Encrypted DNNs. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 31–38. 1 indexed citations
2.
McLeod, Peter, et al.. (2012). Comparing data mining with ensemble classification of breast cancer masses in digital mammograms. Figshare. 55–63. 4 indexed citations
3.
Reed, Nick, Peter McLeod, & Zoltán Dienes. (2009). Implicit knowledge and motor skill: What people who know how to catch don’t know. Consciousness and Cognition. 19(1). 63–76. 37 indexed citations
4.
Verma, Brijesh, et al.. (2009). Classification of benign and malignant patterns in digital mammograms for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(4). 3344–3351. 66 indexed citations
5.
Bilalić, Merim, Peter McLeod, & Fernand Gobet. (2009). Specialization Effect and Its Influence on Memory and Problem Solving in Expert Chess Players. Cognitive Science. 33(6). 1117–1143. 56 indexed citations
6.
Bilalić, Merim, Peter McLeod, & Fernand Gobet. (2008). Expert and “novice” problem solving strategies in chess: Sixty years of citing de Groot (1946). Thinking & Reasoning. 14(4). 395–408. 29 indexed citations
7.
McLeod, Peter, Nick Reed, Stuart J. Gilson, & Andrew Glennerster. (2008). How soccer players head the ball: A test of optic acceleration cancellation theory with virtual reality. Vision Research. 48(13). 1479–1487. 26 indexed citations
8.
Bilalić, Merim, Peter McLeod, & Fernand Gobet. (2008). Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect. Cognition. 108(3). 652–661. 146 indexed citations
9.
Persaud, Navindra & Peter McLeod. (2007). Wagering demonstrates subconscious processing in a binary exclusion task. Consciousness and Cognition. 17(3). 565–575. 31 indexed citations
10.
Persaud, Navindra, Peter McLeod, & Alan Cowey. (2007). Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience. 10(2). 257–261. 292 indexed citations
11.
McLeod, Peter, Nick Reed, & Zoltán Dienes. (2006). The generalized optic acceleration cancellation theory of catching.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 32(1). 139–148. 49 indexed citations
12.
McLeod, Peter, Nick Reed, & Zoltán Dienes. (2003). How fielders arrive in time to catch the ball. Nature. 426(6964). 244–245. 36 indexed citations
13.
McLeod, Peter, Nick Reed, & Zoltán Dienes. (2001). Toward a unified fielder theory: What we do not yet know about how people run to catch a ball.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 27(6). 1347–1355. 8 indexed citations
14.
McLeod, Peter, Tim Shallice, & David C. Plaut. (2000). Attractor dynamics in word recognition: converging evidence from errors by normal subjects, dyslexic patients and a connectionist model. Cognition. 74(1). 91–114. 16 indexed citations
15.
Land, Michael F. & Peter McLeod. (2000). From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience. 3(12). 1340–1345. 538 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Driver, Jon, Peter McLeod, & Zoltán Dienes. (1992). Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory. Perception & Psychophysics. 51(1). 79–85. 85 indexed citations
17.
McLeod, Peter, et al.. (1991). TIMING ACCURACY AND DECISION TIME IN HIGH-SPEED BALL GAMES. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 39 indexed citations
18.
McLeod, Peter, Charles A. Heywood, Jon Driver, & Josef Zihl. (1989). Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature. 339(6224). 466–467. 32 indexed citations
19.
McLeod, Peter, et al.. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature. 332(6160). 154–155. 307 indexed citations
20.
McLeod, Peter, et al.. (1979). How to Reduce Manual Response Interference in the Multiple Task Environment. Ergonomics. 22(4). 469–475. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026