Peter McAtee
- Plant Science top 2%
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 14
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 13
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 4
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 3
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 2
- Biochemistry top 5%
-
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 7
- Plant Reproductive Biology 6
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 2
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert J. SchafferKarine DavidSiti Khadijah A. KarimHelen BoldinghJ. BurdonRoss G. AtkinsonKularajathevan GunaseelanA.C. Richardson
- Journals
- BMC Plant Biology (4 papers)Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (2 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandThailandChina
In The Last Decade
Peter McAtee
20 papers receiving 881 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Plant Science 831
- Biochemistry 90
- Horticulture 6
- Molecular Biology 360
- Food Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Peter McAtee
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McAtee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McAtee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McAtee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McAtee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McAtee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McAtee. The network helps show where Peter McAtee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter McAtee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 75 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 359 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 107 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 44 |
About Peter McAtee
Peter McAtee is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Endocrinology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 922 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (14 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (13 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (7 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (2 papers) and Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (831 citations), Biochemistry (90 citations) and Horticulture (6 citations). Peter McAtee has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Thailand and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Schaffer, Karine David, Siti Khadijah A. Karim, Helen Boldingh, J. Burdon, Ross G. Atkinson, Kularajathevan Gunaseelan, A.C. Richardson, Toshi Foster and Chethi Waite. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Plant Biology, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Frontiers in Plant Science, Postharvest Biology and Technology and Scientia Horticulturae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.