Peter Kong-Ming New
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Amy Auerbacher WilsonRichard W. WilsonRobert M. VeatchRichard M. HesslerJ. Benjamin TaylorLouis A. ZürcherLinda A. GeorgeBernard M. Kramer
- Topics
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers)Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementCommunicationComputational Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Peter Kong-Ming New
31 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- General Health Professions 63
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 43
- Clinical Psychology 35
- Social Psychology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kong-Ming New
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kong-Ming New's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kong-Ming New with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kong-Ming New more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kong-Ming New
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kong-Ming New. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kong-Ming New. The network helps show where Peter Kong-Ming New may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Kong-Ming New
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Kong-Ming New. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Kong-Ming New based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Kong-Ming New. Peter Kong-Ming New is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 97 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | Food and thought: a sociologic study of food cultists. | 11 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Peter Kong-Ming New
Peter Kong-Ming New is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 35 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (43 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Peter Kong-Ming New has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Amy Auerbacher Wilson, Richard W. Wilson, Robert M. Veatch, Richard M. Hessler, J. Benjamin Taylor, Louis A. Zürcher, Linda A. George, Bernard M. Kramer, Floyd H. Taylor and David Ellison. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.