Mark G. Field

71 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark G. Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • General Health Professions 411
  • Health 123
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 178
  • Clinical Psychology 257
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
Replace Arthur M. Kleinman with:
Arthur M. Kleinman United States
James R. Greenley United States
Martin Bloom United States
Robert J. Calsyn United States
Teresa L. Scheid United States
Sarah Rosenfield United States
Ronald M. Wintrob United States
Christiane Brems United States
Helen Spandler United Kingdom
Michele L. Crossley United Kingdom
Mark G. Field relative to Arthur M. Kleinman United States Arthur M. Kleinman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Arthur M. Kleinman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G. Field. The network helps show where Mark G. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark G. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark G. Field Line = papers co-authored together Mark G. Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989238
2 1965178
3 199699
4 198483
5 199971
6 199570
7 197360
8 195957
9 195750
10
Russia's Torn Safety Nets: Health and Social Welfare During the Transition
200038
11 196434
12
Soviet socialized medicine : an introduction
196728
13 200428
14 198825
15 198324
16 199118
17 198518
18 198517
19 198417
20 199016

About Mark G. Field

Mark G. Field is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (4 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Medical History and Research (2 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (411 citations), Health (123 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (178 citations), Clinical Psychology (257 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations). Mark G. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David B. Macklin, Alexander H. Leighton, John S. Harding, Dorothea C. Leighton, Frederic W. Hafferty, Timothy E. Quill, James Plumb, Milton I. Roemer, Leonid S. Snegireff and William A. Glaser. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Problems, Social Science & Medicine and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact