Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Veatch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Veatch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Veatch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Veatch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Veatch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Veatch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Veatch. The network helps show where Robert M. Veatch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Veatch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Veatch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Veatch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Veatch. Robert M. Veatch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Veatch, Robert M.. (2015). The Conflict between Advance Directives and Organ Donation: A New Problem in End-of-Life Planning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
Veatch, Robert M.. (2004). Consent and persons with marginal mental impairment.. PubMed. 8(1). 6–7.1 indexed citations
9.
Veatch, Robert M.. (2002). Withholding nutrition on the conscious mentally disabled patient: a review and commentary.. PubMed. 7(1). 5–7.1 indexed citations
10.
Saß, Hans-Martin, et al.. (1998). Advance directives and surrogate decision making in health care : United States, Germany, and Japan. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).4 indexed citations
11.
Veatch, Robert M., et al.. (1996). Can the moral commons survive autonomy. The Hastings Center Report. 26(6). 41.4 indexed citations
12.
Veatch, Robert M., et al.. (1995). The myth of presumed consent: ethical problems in new organ procurement strategies.. PubMed. 27(2). 1888–92.27 indexed citations
Veatch, Robert M.. (1990). Physicians and cost containment: the ethical conflict.. PubMed. 30(4). 461–82.10 indexed citations
15.
Veatch, Robert M.. (1989). Cross cultural perspectives in medical ethics : readings. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).19 indexed citations
16.
Veatch, Robert M.. (1988). Distributive justice and the allocation of technological resources to the elderly. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
17.
Veatch, Robert M.. (1987). The Patient as Partner: A Theory of Human Experimentation Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics. 16(1).39 indexed citations
18.
Veatch, Robert M.. (1977). Death and dying: the legislative options.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 7(5). 5–8.7 indexed citations
19.
Veatch, Robert M., et al.. (1974). If national health insurance is enacted--who should pay for smokers' medical care?. PubMed. 4(5). 8–10.6 indexed citations
20.
Veatch, Robert M.. (1972). Ethics, Population Policy, and Population Education.. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 36(4).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.