Peter J. Grabner

104 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

Peter J. Grabner
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Algebra and Number Theory 231
  • Mathematical Physics 363
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 110
  • Numerical Analysis 135
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 311
Replace N. J. Young with:
N. J. Young United Kingdom
Michael J. Mossinghoff United States
Horst Alzer Germany
Juan Malumbres Spain
Kenneth B. Stolarsky United States
Henry Crapo France
Ulrich Oberst Austria
H. Groemer United States
Stan Wagon United States
Sergeĭ Konyagin Russia
Peter J. Grabner relative to N. J. Young United Kingdom N. J. Young's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
N. J. Young · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Grabner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Grabner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Grabner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Grabner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Grabner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Grabner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Grabner. The network helps show where Peter J. Grabner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Grabner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Grabner Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Grabner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199479
2 199046
3 201543
4 199542
5 199542
6 199438
7 199732
8 201231
9 202128
10 200227
11 199325
12 199824
13 200620
14 199119
15 199318
16 199718
17 200217
18 200416
19 199616
20 202315

About Peter J. Grabner

Peter J. Grabner is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics and Numerical Analysis, having authored 108 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (24 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (23 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (17 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (15 papers), semigroups and automata theory (13 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (11 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (11 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Identities (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (231 citations), Mathematical Physics (363 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (110 citations), Numerical Analysis (135 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (311 citations). Peter J. Grabner has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Tichy, Helmut Prodinger, Peter Kirschenhofer, Philippe Flajolet, Johann S. Brauchart, Arnold Knopfmacher, Helmut Eichlseder, Pierre Liardet, Clemens Heuberger and Wolfgang Woess. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Acta Arithmetica, Mathematics of Computation, Journal of Number Theory and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact