Peter J. Drew

51 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Peter J. Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Rehabilitation 70
  • Epidemiology 143
  • Dermatology 36
  • Emergency Medicine 34
  • Oncology 100
Replace Khalid Javeed Khan with:
Khalid Javeed Khan United Kingdom
Morris J. Asch United States
Erdinç Kamer Türkiye
Tarik D. Madni United States
BENEDICT M. REYNOLDS United States
Maja Šurbatović Serbia
Audra T. Clark United States
Lara Gianesello Italy
Thayer E. Scott United States
Savaş Sipahi Türkiye
Peter J. Drew relative to Khalid Javeed Khan United Kingdom Khalid Javeed Khan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Khalid Javeed Khan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Drew. The network helps show where Peter J. Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Drew Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200158
2 200857
3 201057
4 202036
5 201532
6 198729
7
Necrotizing fasciitis versus pyoderma gangrenosum: securing the correct diagnosis! A case report and literature review.
201124
8 200922
9 201320
10 200618
11 198517
12 198513
13
Heparin-induced skin necrosis and low molecular weight heparins.
199913
14 201013
15 198412
16 201012
17 202111
18 200110
19 201610
20 20069

About Peter J. Drew

Peter J. Drew is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Nephrology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (10 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (70 citations), Epidemiology (143 citations), Dermatology (36 citations), Emergency Medicine (34 citations) and Oncology (100 citations). Peter J. Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include W.A. Dickson, Sarah Jane Hemington-Gorse, Tom S Potokar, Dean Anthony Harris, Matthew Lloyd Davies, J Beynon, Maira Gonçalves de Oliveira Lucas, Norman John Carr, Frank J. Goodwin and Martyn D. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, British journal of surgery, Clinical Science and Colorectal Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact