Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Leuschel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Leuschel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Leuschel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Leuschel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Leuschel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Leuschel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Leuschel. The network helps show where Michaël Leuschel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michaël Leuschel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michaël Leuschel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michaël Leuschel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michaël Leuschel. Michaël Leuschel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Beek, Maurice H. ter, Roderick Chapman, Rance Cleaveland, et al.. (2024). Formal Methods in Industry. Formal Aspects of Computing. 37(1). 1–38.8 indexed citations
Leuschel, Michaël, Vı́tor Santos Costa, Verónica Dahl, et al.. (2022). Fifty Years of Prolog and Beyond. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. 22(6). 776–858.16 indexed citations
Leuschel, Michaël, et al.. (2011). Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Automated Verification of Critical Systems. School of Computing Science Technical Report Series.2 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Cliff B., et al.. (2011). Proceedings of the 11th workshop on Automated Verification of Critical Systems.1 indexed citations
11.
Butler, Michael & Michaël Leuschel. (2005). Combining CSP and B for Specification and Property Verification. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).6 indexed citations
12.
Leuschel, Michaël. (2003). Logic based program synthesis and transformation : 12th International Workshop, LOPSTR 2002, Madrid, Spain, September 17-20, 2002 : revised selected papers. Springer eBooks.2 indexed citations
Leuschel, Michaël, et al.. (2000). Proceedings of the Workshop on Verification and Computational Logic VCL'2000. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
15.
Hartel, Pieter, Michael Butler, Andrew Currie, et al.. (1999). Questions and Answers About Ten Formal Methods. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).5 indexed citations
Leuschel, Michaël. (1998). Program specialisation and abstract interpretation reconciled. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 220–234.10 indexed citations
18.
Leuschel, Michaël. (1997). The ECCE Partial Deduction System. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
19.
Leuschel, Michaël, et al.. (1996). A Conceptual Embedding of Folding into Partial Deduction: Towards a Maximal Integration. Lirias (KU Leuven). 319–332.32 indexed citations
20.
Leuschel, Michaël & Bern Martens. (1995). Generating specialised update procedures through partial deduction of the ground representation. Lirias (KU Leuven). 81–95.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.