Peter H. W. Biedermann
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael TaborskyFernando E. VegaMartin KaltenpothLaura V. FlórezTobias EnglKier D. KlepzigDiana L. SixHenrik H. De Fine Licht
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (45 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (21 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTrends in Ecology & Evolution
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Peter H. W. Biedermann
54 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Insect Science 1.4k
- Ecology 1.1k
- Genetics 479
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 382
- Plant Science 375
Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. W. Biedermann
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. W. Biedermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. W. Biedermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. W. Biedermann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. W. Biedermann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. W. Biedermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. W. Biedermann. The network helps show where Peter H. W. Biedermann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. W. Biedermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. W. Biedermann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. W. Biedermann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. W. Biedermann. Peter H. W. Biedermann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 107 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | Hidden leks in the Yellow-browed Warbler (Phylloscopus inornatus)? - Investigations from the Khan Khentey Reserve (Mongolia) | 1 |
About Peter H. W. Biedermann
Peter H. W. Biedermann is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (45 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Ecology (1.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (382 citations). Peter H. W. Biedermann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Taborsky, Fernando E. Vega, Martin Kaltenpoth, Laura V. Flórez, Tobias Engl, Kier D. Klepzig, Diana L. Six, Henrik H. De Fine Licht, Marko Rohlfs and Jean‐Claude Grégoire. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.