Christopher M. Ranger
- Insect Science top 0.2%
- Ecology top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael E. RedingPeter B. SchultzJason B. OliverElaine A. BackusMiguel S. SerranoSteven D. FrankDaniel A. HermsAnand B. Persad
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (62 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (56 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (54 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcologyPlant Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySlovakia
In The Last Decade
Christopher M. Ranger
94 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Insect Science 1.9k
- Ecology 1.6k
- Plant Science 855
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 269
- Genetics 210
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Ranger
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Ranger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Ranger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Ranger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Ranger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Ranger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Ranger. The network helps show where Christopher M. Ranger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher M. Ranger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher M. Ranger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher M. Ranger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher M. Ranger. Christopher M. Ranger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | Implications for pesticide delivery and insecticide selection using chemical analysis of plant tissue and efficacy. | 1 |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Christopher M. Ranger
Christopher M. Ranger is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (62 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (56 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (54 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.9k citations), Ecology (1.6k citations) and Plant Science (855 citations). Christopher M. Ranger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Reding, Peter B. Schultz, Jason B. Oliver, Elaine A. Backus, Miguel S. Serrano, Steven D. Frank, Daniel A. Herms, Anand B. Persad, Karla M. Addesso and Davide Rassati. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Annual Review of Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.