Peter Gates

3.8k citations
82 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 28

Peter Gates

74 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Peter Gates
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 188
  • Pharmacology 706
  • Emergency Medical Services 219
  • Applied Psychology 146
  • Health Information Management 108
Replace Melissa J. Krauss with:
Melissa J. Krauss United States
Jill Morrison United Kingdom
Carla L. Storr United States
A Niroshan Siriwardena United Kingdom
Amie Steel Australia
Jo Rick United Kingdom
Margaret A. Keyes United States
Toni Tripp‐Reimer United States
Erin P. Finley United States
Hamid Haghani Iran
Peter Gates relative to Melissa J. Krauss United States Melissa J. Krauss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Melissa J. Krauss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gates. The network helps show where Peter Gates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gates Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 202410
3 202315
4 202119
5 202046
6 20206
7 201920
8
Culture and Disadvantage in Learning Mathematics.
20140
9
Opinions and attitudes of cannabis users on cannabis policy and policing
20140
10 201491
11 201114
12 201181
13 200730
14 20079
15 2005182
16 200571
17 200595
18
LIVES, LEARNING AND LIBERTY THE IMPACT AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION
20041
19 200131
20 20004

About Peter Gates

Peter Gates is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services, Health Information Management, Research and Theory and Computer Science Applications, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (15 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (14 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (12 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (7 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (188 citations), Pharmacology (706 citations), Emergency Medical Services (219 citations), Applied Psychology (146 citations) and Health Information Management (108 citations). Peter Gates has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Copeland, Paul Dillon, Mark A Bellis, Karen Hughes, Wendy Swift, Greg Martin, Stuart Gilmour, Johanna Westbrook, Lucy Albertella and Peter Mtika. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Drug Safety, Addiction, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Journal of Drug Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026