Peter Gaskovski

457 total citations
10 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Peter Gaskovski is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Gaskovski has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Gaskovski's work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers), SAS software applications and methods (2 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). Peter Gaskovski is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers), SAS software applications and methods (2 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). Peter Gaskovski collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Peter Gaskovski's co-authors include John D. Eastwood, Shelley A. Fahlman, Peter Klavora, Daniel Rexroth, Robert P. Quinn, Margaret Young, Kenneth S. Bowers, Georges Monette, Henny A. Westra and Kimberley B. Mercer-Lynn and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, American Journal of Occupational Therapy and The Clinical Neuropsychologist.

In The Last Decade

Peter Gaskovski

10 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Gaskovski Canada 7 158 67 54 45 42 10 310
F.K. Withaar Netherlands 11 146 0.9× 74 1.1× 71 1.3× 69 1.5× 86 2.0× 25 581
Ruth Lowry United Kingdom 13 56 0.4× 51 0.8× 53 1.0× 76 1.7× 16 0.4× 40 446
Rita Shapiro United States 7 32 0.2× 39 0.6× 32 0.6× 21 0.5× 16 0.4× 10 245
R. Lawrence Merkel United States 12 248 1.6× 73 1.1× 134 2.5× 5 0.1× 69 1.6× 20 621
Lauren A. Demers United States 10 85 0.5× 83 1.2× 125 2.3× 22 0.5× 79 1.9× 17 319
Stewart Ollis United Kingdom 11 57 0.4× 104 1.6× 22 0.4× 55 1.2× 54 1.3× 12 593
Gabriele Optale Italy 9 72 0.5× 45 0.7× 82 1.5× 26 0.6× 46 1.1× 16 400
Valérie Poulin Canada 11 76 0.5× 35 0.5× 39 0.7× 5 0.1× 23 0.5× 42 501
Ahmos Rolider Canada 11 92 0.6× 49 0.7× 88 1.6× 9 0.2× 18 0.4× 21 274
Bradley Fawver United States 12 90 0.6× 144 2.1× 30 0.6× 18 0.4× 36 0.9× 35 343

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gaskovski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gaskovski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gaskovski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gaskovski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gaskovski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gaskovski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gaskovski. The network helps show where Peter Gaskovski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Gaskovski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Gaskovski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Gaskovski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Gaskovski. Peter Gaskovski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Monette, Georges, et al.. (2016). The creation of the client reflexivity scale: A measure of minute fluctuations in self-awareness and exploration.. Psychotherapy Research. 27(6). 724–736. 2 indexed citations
2.
Gaskovski, Peter, et al.. (2013). Mapping Good Therapy Sessions: A Pilot Study of Within-Session Client Affect. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 44(1). 21–29. 2 indexed citations
3.
Fahlman, Shelley A., et al.. (2009). Does a Lack of Life Meaning Cause Boredom? Results from Psychometric, Longitudinal, and Experimental Analyses. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 28(3). 307–340. 150 indexed citations
4.
Gaskovski, Peter, et al.. (2002). Cumulative Illness and Neuropsychological Decline in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 16(2). 145–156. 26 indexed citations
5.
Gaskovski, Peter. (1999). The clinician's art, or why science is not enough.. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 40(4). 320–327. 2 indexed citations
6.
Eastwood, John D., Peter Gaskovski, & Kenneth S. Bowers. (1998). The folly of effort: Ironic effects in the mental control of pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 46(1). 77–91. 11 indexed citations
7.
Klavora, Peter, et al.. (1995). Rehabilitation of Visual Skills Using the Dynavision: A Single Case Experimental Study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 62(1). 37–43. 8 indexed citations
8.
Klavora, Peter, et al.. (1995). The Effects of Dynavision Rehabilitation on Behind-the-Wheel Driving Ability and Selected Psychomotor Abilities of Persons After Stroke. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 49(6). 534–542. 48 indexed citations
9.
Klavora, Peter, et al.. (1995). Test-Retest Reliability of Three Dynavision Tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 80(2). 607–610. 36 indexed citations
10.
Klavora, Peter, et al.. (1994). Test-Retest Reliability of the Dynavision Apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 79(1). 448–450. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026