Daniel Rexroth

665 total citations
8 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Daniel Rexroth is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Rexroth has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Daniel Rexroth's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). Daniel Rexroth is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). Daniel Rexroth collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Daniel Rexroth's co-authors include Frank Knoefel, Frederick W. Unverzagt, Michael Marsiske, Sarah E. Cook, Michael Crowe, Virginia G. Wadley, Sharon L. Tennstedt, George W. Rebok, Peter Gaskovski and David M. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society and Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Rexroth

7 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Rexroth United States	7	213	97	58	49	48	8	366
Karen Seligman United States	7	247 1.2×	52 0.5×	60 1.0×	39 0.8×	40 0.8×	8	539
Sandra Eifflaender‐Gorfer Germany	9	228 1.1×	61 0.6×	107 1.8×	35 0.7×	36 0.8×	10	456
Kae Ito Japan	10	156 0.7×	112 1.2×	89 1.5×	39 0.8×	30 0.6×	36	375
Fumiko Miyamae Japan	13	231 1.1×	137 1.4×	132 2.3×	46 0.9×	38 0.8×	41	536
Joella E. Storey Australia	5	337 1.6×	113 1.2×	137 2.4×	29 0.6×	86 1.8×	5	501
Maria Johansson Sweden	10	118 0.6×	73 0.8×	57 1.0×	19 0.4×	32 0.7×	25	260
Susan E. MacNeill United States	15	330 1.5×	73 0.8×	156 2.7×	33 0.7×	34 0.7×	39	619
Toru Okura United States	5	326 1.5×	38 0.4×	110 1.9×	26 0.5×	31 0.6×	8	453
Ippei Chiba Japan	15	196 0.9×	165 1.7×	109 1.9×	25 0.5×	32 0.7×	55	566
Dimity Pond Australia	5	270 1.3×	96 1.0×	108 1.9×	16 0.3×	39 0.8×	6	389

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rexroth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rexroth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rexroth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rexroth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rexroth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rexroth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rexroth. The network helps show where Daniel Rexroth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Rexroth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Rexroth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Rexroth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Rexroth. Daniel Rexroth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Tam, Joyce, Kiran Khurshid, Briana N. Sprague, et al.. (2023). Design and baseline characteristics of the Cognitive and Aerobic Resilience for the Brain (CARB) study. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 131. 107249–107249.

Rexroth, Daniel, Sharon L. Tennstedt, Richard N. Jones, et al.. (2013). Relationship of Demographic and Health Factors to Cognition in Older Adults in the ACTIVE Study. Journal of Aging and Health. 25(8_suppl). 128S–146S. 24 indexed citations

Fillenbaum, Gerda G., Bruce M. Burchett, Frederick W. Unverzagt, Daniel Rexroth, & Kathleen A. Welsh‐Bohmer. (2011). Norms for CERAD Constructional Praxis Recall. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 25(8). 1345–1358. 17 indexed citations

Rexroth, Daniel & Robert P. Friedland. (2010). Lessons Learned Regarding Recruitment to the National African American Alzheimer Disease Health Literacy Program. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 24(Suppl 1). S54–S57. 6 indexed citations

Unverzagt, Frederick W., Linda Kasten, Kathy Johnson, et al.. (2007). Effect of memory impairment on training outcomes in ACTIVE. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 13(6). 953–960. 90 indexed citations

Wadley, Virginia G., Michael Crowe, Michael Marsiske, et al.. (2007). Changes in Everyday Function in Individuals with Psychometrically Defined Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 55(8). 1192–1198. 86 indexed citations

Gaskovski, Peter, et al.. (2002). Cumulative Illness and Neuropsychological Decline in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 16(2). 145–156. 26 indexed citations

Knoefel, Frank, et al.. (2001). Medical Comorbidity and Rehabilitation Efficiency in Geriatric Inpatients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 49(11). 1471–1477. 117 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact