Peter G. Stillman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Topics
- Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers)Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (6 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter G. Stillman
26 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Sociology and Political Science 228
- Political Science and International Relations 96
- Social Psychology 93
- Philosophy 76
- Applied Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Peter G. Stillman
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter G. Stillman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter G. Stillman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter G. Stillman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter G. Stillman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter G. Stillman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter G. Stillman. The network helps show where Peter G. Stillman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter G. Stillman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter G. Stillman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter G. Stillman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter G. Stillman. Peter G. Stillman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identity, Complicity, and Resistance in The Handmaid's Tale* | 9 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | Dystopian Critiques, Utopian Possibilities, and Human Purposes in Octavia Butler's Parables. (Essays on Octavia Butler) | 4 |
| 8 | Dystopian Critiques, Utopian Possibilities, and Human Purposes in Octavia Butler's Parables | 15 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | The Confessions and Correspondence, Including the Letters to Malesherbes | 26 |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | Hegel's philosophy of spirit | 5 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | The Tragedy of the Commons: A Re-Analysis. | 13 |
About Peter G. Stillman
Peter G. Stillman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 31 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (6 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (37 citations), Applied Psychology (61 citations) and Philosophy (76 citations). Peter G. Stillman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Jacques Rousseau, Christopher Kelly, Roger D. Masters, Kenneth M. Roemer and Thomas Reuter. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Behavioral Scientist and Perspectives on Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.