Peter Erwin

5.5k citations
90 papers · 3.7k indexed · h-index 33

Peter Erwin

87 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Peter Erwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Instrumentation 1.5k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.9k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 351
  • Public Administration 96
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 104
Replace David Davis with:
David Davis United States
Keith Hawkins United States
D. Downes France
M. S. Roberts United States
Christian Ritter United States
J. Regis McNamara United States
D. F. Lester United States
David E. Kaplan United States
Susan Gardner United States
O. Stahl Germany
Peter Erwin relative to David Davis United States David Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.6×
David Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Erwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Erwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Erwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Erwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Erwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Erwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Erwin. The network helps show where Peter Erwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Erwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Erwin Line = papers co-authored together Peter Erwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20238
2 20235
3 20233
4 202316
5 202312
6 20226
7 201932
8 201937
9 201613
10 2016188
11 201524
12 201289
13 20101
14 201055
15 200810
16 20040
17 200366
18 19965
19 199129
20 19901

About Peter Erwin

Peter Erwin is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Public Administration, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 90 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (55 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (45 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (44 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (19 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (15 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Scientific Research and Discoveries (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (1.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.9k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (351 citations), Public Administration (96 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (104 citations). Peter Erwin has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Roderick D. Iverson, Alister W. Graham, Ignacio Trujillo, Victor P. Debattista, R. P. Saglia, R. Bender, Mara Olekalns, Jens Thomas, J. E. Beckman and Linda S. Sparke. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astronomical Journal, Astronomy and Astrophysics and British Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026