M. K. Seidel

649 total citations
17 papers, 477 citations indexed

About

M. K. Seidel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, M. K. Seidel has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 477 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in M. K. Seidel's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (15 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers). M. K. Seidel is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (15 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers). M. K. Seidel collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United States and Germany. M. K. Seidel's co-authors include J. Falcón‐Barroso, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, Isabel Pérez, Dimitri A. Gadotti, A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres, Francesca Fragkoudi, P. Coelho, Glenn van de Ven, Ryan Leaman and Miguel Querejeta and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

M. K. Seidel

17 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. K. Seidel Spain	12	444	254	22	16	13	17	477
Adam Schaefer United States	11	471 1.1×	241 0.9×	18 0.8×	16 1.0×	7 0.5×	14	483
Adriano Poci Australia	11	344 0.8×	222 0.9×	12 0.5×	23 1.4×	14 1.1×	18	363
José Sánchez-Gallego United States	5	360 0.8×	200 0.8×	17 0.8×	16 1.0×	6 0.5×	21	377
V. Kalinova Germany	11	401 0.9×	187 0.7×	18 0.8×	12 0.8×	18 1.4×	18	411
Taniya Parikh United Kingdom	10	401 0.9×	281 1.1×	12 0.5×	8 0.5×	6 0.5×	13	414
Scott G. Carlsten United States	9	404 0.9×	219 0.9×	10 0.5×	13 0.8×	13 1.0×	15	418
Anna de Graaff Germany	10	286 0.6×	180 0.7×	15 0.7×	15 0.9×	7 0.5×	26	323
Ignacio D. Gargiulo Chile	8	421 0.9×	271 1.1×	17 0.8×	11 0.7×	21 1.6×	11	446
Erin Kado-Fong United States	13	410 0.9×	237 0.9×	14 0.6×	18 1.1×	12 0.9×	25	433
Sree Oh Australia	10	312 0.7×	195 0.8×	13 0.6×	8 0.5×	7 0.5×	26	333

Countries citing papers authored by M. K. Seidel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. K. Seidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. K. Seidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. K. Seidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. K. Seidel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. K. Seidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. K. Seidel. The network helps show where M. K. Seidel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. K. Seidel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. K. Seidel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. K. Seidel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. K. Seidel. M. K. Seidel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Seth, Anil C., Peter Erwin, Victor P. Debattista, et al.. (2023). Composite Bulges. III. A Study of Nuclear Star Clusters in Nearby Spiral Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 958(1). 100–100. 5 indexed citations

Erwin, Peter, Anil C. Seth, Victor P. Debattista, et al.. (2021). Composite bulges – II. Classical bulges and nuclear discs in barred galaxies: the contrasting cases of NGC 4608 and NGC 4643. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(2). 2446–2473. 20 indexed citations

Neumann, Justus, Francesca Fragkoudi, Isabel Pérez, et al.. (2020). . Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 30 indexed citations

Bittner, A., P. Sánchez–Blázquez, Dimitri A. Gadotti, et al.. (2020). Inside-out formation of nuclear discs and the absence of old central spheroids in barred galaxies of the TIMER survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 643. A65–A65. 54 indexed citations

Gadotti, Dimitri A., A. Bittner, J. Falcón‐Barroso, et al.. (2020). Kinematic signatures of nuclear discs and bar-driven secular evolution in nearby galaxies of the MUSE TIMER project. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 643. A14–A14. 72 indexed citations

Knapen, J. H., S. Comerón, & M. K. Seidel. (2019). MUSE-AO view of the starburst–AGN connection: NGC 7130⋆. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 10 indexed citations

Lorenzo-Cáceres, A. de, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, J. Méndez‐Abreu, et al.. (2019). Clocking the assembly of double-barred galaxies with the MUSE TIMER project. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 484(4). 5296–5314. 30 indexed citations

Leaman, Ryan, Francesca Fragkoudi, Miguel Querejeta, et al.. (2019). Survival of molecular gas in a stellar feedback-driven outflow witnessed with the MUSE TIMER project and ALMA. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 488(3). 3904–3928. 20 indexed citations

Gadotti, Dimitri A., P. Sánchez–Blázquez, J. Falcón‐Barroso, et al.. (2018). Investigating the Formation and Evolution of Massive Disc Galaxies with the MUSE TIMER Project. 1 indexed citations

10.

Gadotti, Dimitri A., P. Sánchez–Blázquez, J. Falcón‐Barroso, et al.. (2018). Time Inference with MUSE in Extragalactic Rings (TIMER): properties of the survey and high-level data products. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 482(1). 506–529. 82 indexed citations

11.

Méndez‐Abreu, J., A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres, Dimitri A. Gadotti, et al.. (2018). Inner bars also buckle. The MUSE TIMER view of the double-barred galaxy NGC 1291. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 482(1). L118–L122. 24 indexed citations

12.

Weisberg, M. K., et al.. (2018). The Dark Galaxy Hypothesis. Philosophy of Science. 85(5). 1204–1215. 4 indexed citations

13.

Seidel, M. K., J. Falcón‐Barroso, Inma Martínez-Valpuesta, et al.. (2016). The BaLROG project – II. Quantifying the influence of bars on the stellar populations of nearby galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 460(4). 3784–3828. 23 indexed citations

14.

Seidel, M. K., et al.. (2016). The Flying Telescope: How to Reach Remote Areas in the Colombian Andes for Astronomy Outreach. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 21. 31. 1 indexed citations

15.

Gadotti, Dimitri A., M. K. Seidel, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, et al.. (2015). MUSE tells the story of NGC 4371: The dawning of secular evolution. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 49 indexed citations

16.

Seidel, M. K., J. Falcón‐Barroso, Inma Martínez-Valpuesta, et al.. (2015). The BaLROG project – I. Quantifying the influence of bars on the kinematics of nearby galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 451(1). 936–973. 27 indexed citations

17.

Seidel, M. K., T. Ruiz-Lara, J. Falcón‐Barroso, et al.. (2014). Dissecting galactic bulges in space and time – I. The importance of early formation scenarios versus secular evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 446(3). 2837–2860. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact