Peter Dorey
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Labor Movements and Unions
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Political Systems and Governance
Papers in
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 39
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 9
- Political Systems and Governance 8
-
- Labor Movements and Unions 4
- Co-authors
- Andrew DenhamHill KuluMark GarnettAndrew S. CrinesTimothy HeppellChris HowellAlexandra KelsoKatherine Keenan
- Journals
- British Politics (10 papers)The Political Quarterly (7 papers)Representation (3 papers)Parliamentary Affairs (2 papers)Contemporary British History (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingaporeIran
In The Last Decade
Peter Dorey
63 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Public Administration 57
- Political Science and International Relations 376
- Finance 82
- Modeling and Simulation 25
- Gender Studies 36
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dorey
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dorey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dorey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dorey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dorey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dorey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dorey. The network helps show where Peter Dorey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dorey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 9 | Policy making in Britain: an introduction (2nd ed.) | 2014 | 3 |
| 10 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 11 | House of Lords reform since 1911: must the Lords go? | 2011 | 2 |
| 12 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 19 | British Politics since 1945 | 1995 | 10 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1 |
About Peter Dorey
Peter Dorey is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, History, Modeling and Simulation and Finance, having authored 67 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (39 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers), Political Systems and Governance (8 papers), Irish and British Studies (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (57 citations), Political Science and International Relations (376 citations), Finance (82 citations), Modeling and Simulation (25 citations) and Gender Studies (36 citations). Peter Dorey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Denham, Hill Kulu, Mark Garnett, Andrew S. Crines, Timothy Heppell, Chris Howell, Alexandra Kelso, Katherine Keenan, Philip Lynch and Júlia Mikolai. Their work appears in journals such as British Politics, The Political Quarterly, Representation, Parliamentary Affairs and Contemporary British History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.