Mark Garnett

644 citations
54 papers · 291 indexed · h-index 9

Mark Garnett

46 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Mark Garnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Public Administration 31
  • Political Science and International Relations 196
  • Finance 38
  • Strategy and Management 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 101
Replace Andrew Denham with:
Andrew Denham United Kingdom
Didier Georgakakis France
José M. Magone Germany
Richard Heffernan United Kingdom
Bojan Bugarič United Kingdom
Nico Randeraad Netherlands
Paul Carmichael United Kingdom
Elizabeth McLeay New Zealand
Owen Worth Ireland
Magnus Jerneck Sweden
Mark Garnett relative to Andrew Denham United Kingdom Andrew Denham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew Denham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Garnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Garnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Garnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Garnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Garnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Garnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Garnett. The network helps show where Mark Garnett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark Garnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Garnett Line = papers co-authored together Mark Garnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20220
3 20200
4 20173
5 20166
6 20132
7 20131
8 20112
9 20101
10 200614
11 20040
12
The A-Z guide to modern British history
20032
13
Splendid! Splendid! The Authorised Biography of Willie Whitelaw.
20025
14 20022
15 20021
16
Keith Joseph: A Life.
20011
17
Whatever happened to the Tories : the Conservative Party since 1945
199812
18 199619
19 19942
20 19935

About Mark Garnett

Mark Garnett is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, History, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (21 papers), Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (31 citations), Political Science and International Relations (196 citations), Finance (38 citations), Strategy and Management (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (101 citations). Mark Garnett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Denham, Diane Stone, Peter Dorey, David Denver, Philip Lynch, Kevin Hickson, Simon Mabon, Robert C. Smith and Patrick Diamond. Their work appears in journals such as The Political Quarterly, British Politics, Contemporary British History, Government and Opposition and The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026