Representation

912 papers and 7.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 912 papers published in Representation in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Representation usually cover Political Science and International Relations (605 papers), Sociology and Political Science (263 papers) and Gender Studies (133 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (367 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (132 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Representation are Ron Johnston, Edward Fieldhouse, Drude Dahlerup, Karen Celis, Georg Lütz, Peter Pulzer, Sarah Childs, Fiona Mackay, Jacques Thomassen and Judith Squires.

In The Last Decade

Representation

637 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Representation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Representation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Representation.

Countries where authors publish in Representation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Representation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Representation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Representation more than expected).

Mixed‐Member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? 2002 2026 2010 2018 387
  1. Mixed‐Member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? (2002)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026