439 total citations 42 papers, 159 citations indexed
About
Peter Cryle is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory.
According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Cryle has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in History, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Peter Cryle's work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (8 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers) and Literature and Culture Studies (4 papers). Peter Cryle is often cited by papers focused on Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (8 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers) and Literature and Culture Studies (4 papers). Peter Cryle collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Peter Cryle's co-authors include Elizabeth Stephens, John Phillips, Lisa Downing, Lisa O’Connell and Christopher E. Forth and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, SubStance and Sexualities.
In The Last Decade
Peter Cryle
27 papers
receiving
121 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cryle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cryle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cryle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cryle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cryle. The network helps show where Peter Cryle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Cryle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Cryle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Cryle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Cryle. Peter Cryle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cryle, Peter. (2019). Framing Premodern Desires: Sexual Ideas, Attitudes, and Practices in Europe ed. by Satu Lidman et al. (review). Journal of the History of Sexuality. 28(3). 525–526.
Cryle, Peter. (2005). 'Desiring the dead': Necrophilia and nineteenth-century French literature. The Modern Language Review. 100(1). 505–506.1 indexed citations
10.
Cryle, Peter. (2003). Le Marbre feminin. Revue d Histoire des Sciences Humaines. 147–155.1 indexed citations
11.
Cryle, Peter. (2003). La crise du plaisir. Presses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks.1 indexed citations
Cryle, Peter. (2000). The Kama Sutra as curriculum. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 17–25.5 indexed citations
Cryle, Peter. (1993). Unlocking Australia's Language Potential: Profiles of 9 Key Languages in Australia. Volume 3, French..1 indexed citations
18.
Cryle, Peter, et al.. (1993). Unlocking Australia's language potential: Profiles of 9 key languages in Australia (Vol. 3: French). Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–217.3 indexed citations
Cryle, Peter. (1973). Bilan critique: L'exil et le royaume d'Albert Camus.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.