Ivan Crozier
- History top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Co-authors
- Christopher E. ForthHavelock EllisJohn Addington SymondsEric J. EngstromOristelle BonisHeike Bauer
- Topics
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (13 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers)Medical History and Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Law and PsychiatryIsisStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ivan Crozier
24 papers receiving 144 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- History 109
- Sociology and Political Science 71
- Clinical Psychology 59
- Political Science and International Relations 31
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 23
Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Crozier
This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Crozier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Crozier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Crozier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Crozier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Crozier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Crozier. The network helps show where Ivan Crozier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivan Crozier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivan Crozier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivan Crozier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivan Crozier. Ivan Crozier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Sexology, historiography, citation, embodiment: a review and (frank) exchange | 3 |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Sexual Inversion: A Critical Edition | 20 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Body Parts: Critical Explorations in Corporeality | 14 |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Ivan Crozier
Ivan Crozier is a scholar working on History, General Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (13 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (5 papers) and Medical History and Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (109 citations), General Psychology (10 citations) and Clinical Psychology (59 citations). Ivan Crozier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher E. Forth, Havelock Ellis, John Addington Symonds, Eric J. Engstrom, Oristelle Bonis and Heike Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Isis and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.