Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain
2010623 citationsFranco Cauda, Federico D’Agata et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Katiuscia Sacco
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Katiuscia Sacco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katiuscia Sacco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katiuscia Sacco more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katiuscia Sacco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katiuscia Sacco. The network helps show where Katiuscia Sacco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katiuscia Sacco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katiuscia Sacco.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katiuscia Sacco based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Katiuscia Sacco. Katiuscia Sacco is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Geda, Elisabetta, et al.. (2017). Control curves for a new lower limbs robotic exoskeleton obtained from the study of joints angles during an unloaded human walking. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino).
8.
Parola, Alberto, et al.. (2015). Linguistic, extralinguistic and paralinguistic abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage (RHD). Conference Cognitive Science. 1419. 674–679.1 indexed citations
9.
Radicioni, Daniele P., Francesca Garbarini, Monica Biggio, et al.. (2015). On Mental Imagery in Lexical Processing: Computational Modeling of the Visual Load Associated to Concepts.. Conference Cognitive Science. 1419. 181–186.2 indexed citations
Baudino, Bruno, Federico D’Agata, G. Castellano, et al.. (2010). Chemotherapy Effects on Cerebral GlucoseMetabolism at Rest. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 237–237.1 indexed citations
17.
Angeleri, Romina, et al.. (2007). Valutazione della competenza pragmatica: uno studio evolutivo. RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA.
18.
Bosco, Francesca M., et al.. (2007). Communicative Ability in Schizophrenic Patients: Executive Function, Theory of Mind and Mental Representations. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29). 1593–1598.2 indexed citations
19.
Bosco, Francesca M., Katiuscia Sacco, Livia Colle, et al.. (2004). Simple and Complex Extralinguistic Communicative Acts. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26). 144–149.6 indexed citations
20.
Sacco, Katiuscia, Monica Bucciarelli, & Mauro Adenzato. (2001). Mental Models and the Meaning of Connectives: A Study in Children, Adolescents and Adults. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23). 875–880.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.