Peter Beal
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History 3
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 2
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 1
- Museology top 10%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 2
-
- Irish and British Studies 1
-
- Lexicography and Language Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Margaret J. M. EzellA. S. G. Edwards
- Journals
- The Library (3 papers)The Yearbook of English Studies (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Beal
11 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Classics 42
- History 67
- Literature and Literary Theory 68
- Museology 13
- Anthropology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Beal
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Beal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Beal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Beal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Beal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Beal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Beal. The network helps show where Peter Beal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Peter Beal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Discovering, identifying and editing early modern manuscripts | 2013 | 0 |
| 2 | Bouldering: Movement, Tactics, and Problem Solving | 2011 | 2 |
| 3 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 4 | Elizabeth I and the culture of writing | 2007 | 7 |
| 5 | Introduction: Do Manuscript Studies in the Early Modern Period Have a Future? | 2004 | 1 |
| 6 | Manuscripts and their makers in the English Renaissance | 2002 | 1 |
| 7 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 8 | Writings by early modern women | 2000 | 5 |
| 9 | 1998 | 22 | |
| 10 | In Praise of Scribes: Manuscripts and their Makers in Seventeenth-Century England | 1998 | 40 |
| 11 | Parnassus biceps, or, Severall choice pieces of poetry | 1990 | 1 |
| 12 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 13 | Index of English Literary Manuscripts | 1980 | 48 |
| 14 | 1980 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 2 |
About Peter Beal
Peter Beal is a scholar working on Classics, Museology, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (42 citations), History (67 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (68 citations), Museology (13 citations) and Anthropology (23 citations). Frequent co-authors include Margaret J. M. Ezell and A. S. G. Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as The Library, The Yearbook of English Studies, Oxford University Press eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.