William H. Sherman
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 1
- Classics top 10%
- History top 2%
- Travel Writing and Literature 2
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philippine History and Culture 5
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
-
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 2
-
- History of Science and Medicine 1
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 1
-
- Financial Crisis of the 21st Century 1
- Co-authors
- Peter HulmeBillie MelmanKate TeltscherR. C. BridgesRod EdmondJoan‐Pau RubiésHelen CarrTim Youngs
- Journals
- Huntington Library Quarterly (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
William H. Sherman
6 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 77
- Classics 24
- History 66
- Anthropology 54
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 14
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Sherman. The network helps show where William H. Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside William H. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The tempest : an authoritative text, sources and contexts, criticism, rewritings and appropriations | 2019 | 0 |
| 2 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 3 | Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England | 2007 | 81 |
| 4 | The tempest : sources and contexts, criticism, rewritings and appropriations | 2004 | 1 |
| 5 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 8 |
About William H. Sherman
William H. Sherman is a scholar working on Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Finance, having authored 9 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philippine History and Culture (5 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (77 citations), Classics (24 citations), History (66 citations), Anthropology (54 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations). William H. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Hulme, Billie Melman, Kate Teltscher, R. C. Bridges, Rod Edmond, Joan‐Pau Rubiés, Helen Carr, Tim Youngs, Mary Baine Campbell and James Buzard. Their work appears in journals such as Huntington Library Quarterly, The Modern Language Review, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization and Renaissance and Reformation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.