Peter Barth

8.5k citations
149 papers · 6.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 40

Peter Barth

147 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Hit Papers

Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized...1.8k200920262014202050010001.5k

Peers

Peter Barth
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Neurology 1.6k
  • Oncology 2.9k
  • Epidemiology 2.4k
  • Cancer Research 580
  • Surgery 1.3k
Replace Bita Esmaeli with:
Bita Esmaeli United States
Kiyoshi Mukai Japan
Fausto Sessa Italy
Jiří Bártek Denmark
Swee T. Tan New Zealand
Paul S. Thorner Canada
Herwart F. Otto Germany
Nobuaki Funata Japan
Pierre Bordigoni France
Ziv Gil Israel
Peter Barth relative to Bita Esmaeli United States Bita Esmaeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bita Esmaeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Barth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Barth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Barth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Barth. The network helps show where Peter Barth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Barth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Barth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Barth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20245
2 20241
3 20226
4 201913
5 201448
6 201212
7
Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors: A Report From the PROMID Study Groupbreakdown →
20091773
8 20094
9 20091
10 200614
11 200552
12 200321
13 200244
14 2001111
15
Frequent abnormalities of the putative tumor suppressor gene FHIT at 3p14.2 in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines.
199846
16 19974
17 199416
18 199421
19 199428
20 199413

About Peter Barth

Peter Barth is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 149 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (16 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (10 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (8 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (7 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.6k citations), Oncology (2.9k citations) and Epidemiology (2.4k citations). Peter Barth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Annette Ramaswamy, Birte Steiniger, Roland Moll, Rudolf Arnold, Klaus‐Jochen Klose, Hans‐Helge Müller, Thomas M. Gress, Carmen Schade‐Brittinger, Anja Rinke and M. Wied. Their work appears in journals such as Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, Histochemistry and Cell Biology, World Journal of Surgery, Gut and Cancers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026