Hans‐Helge Müller
- Oncology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Hepatology top 2%
- Co-authors
- H. SchäferCarmen Schade‐BrittingerAnja RinkeRudolf ArnoldThomas M. GressBehnaz AminossadatiPeter BarthM. Wied
- Topics
- Optimal Experimental Design Methods (12 papers)Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (11 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyOncologyEpidemiology
- Journals
- CirculationJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hans‐Helge Müller
96 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Oncology 2.5k
- Epidemiology 2.3k
- Neurology 1.8k
- Surgery 917
- Hepatology 503
Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Helge Müller
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Helge Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Helge Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Helge Müller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Helge Müller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Helge Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Helge Müller. The network helps show where Hans‐Helge Müller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans‐Helge Müller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans‐Helge Müller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans‐Helge Müller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans‐Helge Müller. Hans‐Helge Müller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 254 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors: A Report From the PROMID Study Groupbreakdown → | 1773 |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 260 | |
| 19 | 116 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Hans‐Helge Müller
Hans‐Helge Müller is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Statistics and Probability and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 98 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (12 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (11 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.8k citations), Oncology (2.5k citations) and Epidemiology (2.3k citations). Hans‐Helge Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include H. Schäfer, Carmen Schade‐Brittinger, Anja Rinke, Rudolf Arnold, Thomas M. Gress, Behnaz Aminossadati, Peter Barth, M. Wied, Klaus‐Jochen Klose and Jan Harder. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.