Peter Baldwin

2.5k citations
26 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Baldwin

24 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Peter Baldwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Political Science and International Relations 377
  • Development 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 479
  • History 108
  • History and Philosophy of Science 43
Replace Peter Redfield with:
Peter Redfield United States
Karen Barkey United States
Mara Loveman United States
Julian Go United States
Leslie Page Moch United States
Tracy B. Strong United States
Michel Wieviorka France
Philip Corrigan United Kingdom
Lidwien Kapteijns United States
David Killingray United Kingdom
Peter Baldwin relative to Peter Redfield United States Peter Redfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter Redfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Baldwin. The network helps show where Peter Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Peter Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Baldwin Line = papers co-authored together Peter Baldwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 20213
3 201911
4 20141
5 20112
6 20052
7 200532
8 200510
9 200312
10 200018
11 20003
12 1999172
13 19929
14
La política de solidaridad social: bases sociales del estado de bienestar europeo, 1875-1975
19926
15 1992339
16 19929
17 19909
18 198920
19 19822
20 19815

About Peter Baldwin

Peter Baldwin is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (2 papers), Military History and Strategy (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (377 citations), Development (40 citations), Sociology and Political Science (479 citations), History (108 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations). Peter Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Stanley Hoffmann, George Steinmetz, Filipe Correia Martins and Helen Bolton. Their work appears in journals such as History of European Ideas, Journal of Contemporary History, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Foreign Affairs and Central European History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026