Leslie Page Moch

1.3k citations
46 papers · 694 indexed · h-index 11

Leslie Page Moch

39 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Leslie Page Moch
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Demography 182
  • Sociology and Political Science 480
  • History 76
  • History and Philosophy of Science 26
  • Political Science and International Relations 134
Replace Dirk Hoerder with:
Dirk Hoerder Germany
V. G. Kiernan United Kingdom
Vijay Prashad United States
Walter LaFeber United States
William Brustein United States
Amy Kaplan United States
Marlou Schrover Netherlands
Stuart Μ. Blumin United States
Rowland Berthoff United States
Victoria E. Bonnell United States
Leslie Page Moch relative to Dirk Hoerder Germany Dirk Hoerder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dirk Hoerder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Page Moch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Page Moch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Page Moch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Page Moch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leslie Page Moch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Page Moch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Page Moch. The network helps show where Leslie Page Moch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leslie Page Moch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leslie Page Moch Line = papers co-authored together Leslie Page Moch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20236
2 20131
3 20125
4 20129
5
Internal migration before and during the Industrial Revolution: the case of France and Germany Internal Migration
20113
6 20111
7 20092
8 20039
9 20011
10 19981
11
Mark Traugott - The French Worker: Autobiographies from theEarly Industrial Era
19951
12 1995263
13 19942
14 19901
15 199029
16 198765
17 19863
18 19847
19 198424
20
Essays on the family and historical change
198315

About Leslie Page Moch

Leslie Page Moch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Demography, having authored 46 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (9 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (5 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (5 papers), Migration, Identity, and Health (3 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers) and European Political History Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (182 citations), Sociology and Political Science (480 citations) and History (76 citations). Leslie Page Moch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dudley Baines, Rachel G. Fuchs, Hugh Tinker, Heinz Faßmann, Mitsuru Shimpo, Robin Cohen, Keith Sword, Henry Finch, Kitty Calavita and V. G. Kiernan. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026