Peter Allmark

88 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Allmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Research and Theory 45
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • General Health Professions 551
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 428
  • Public Administration 53
Replace Mark Avis with:
Mark Avis United Kingdom
Maria Lorentzon United Kingdom
Gina Higginbottom Canada
Stephanie Wheeler United Kingdom
Denise Gastaldo Canada
Sarah Cowley United Kingdom
Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom
Annatjie Botes South Africa
Maura Dowling Ireland
Margaret H. Kearney United States
Peter Allmark relative to Mark Avis United Kingdom Mark Avis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Mark Avis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Allmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Allmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Allmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Allmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Allmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Allmark. The network helps show where Peter Allmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Allmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Allmark Line = papers co-authored together Peter Allmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000149
2 2009130
3 2017127
4 2008108
5 200487
6 201679
7 199574
8 200670
9 199558
10 200255
11 200954
12 199548
13 200647
14 201538
15 201234
16 201734
17 202233
18 200333
19 199230
20 199330

About Peter Allmark

Peter Allmark is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (26 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (17 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (12 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (45 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), General Health Professions (551 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (428 citations) and Public Administration (53 citations). Peter Allmark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Angela Tod, Suzanne Mason, Julia Hirst, Hilary Piercy, Elizabeth Goyder, Eleni Chambers, Andrew R. Thompson, Jonathan Boote, Amanda Clarke and Ann McDonnell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Medical Ethics, Nursing Philosophy, BMC Public Health and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact