Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Perry Anderson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Perry Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perry Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perry Anderson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Perry Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Perry Anderson. The network helps show where Perry Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Perry Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Perry Anderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Perry Anderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Perry Anderson. Perry Anderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, Perry. (2015). Die Entstehung des absolutistischen Staates. Suhrkamp eBooks.2 indexed citations
2.
Anderson, Perry. (2014). The Italian Disaster. London review of books. 36(10). 3–16.7 indexed citations
3.
Anderson, Perry. (2013). Homeland: la política interna de Estados Unidos. New left review. 7–37.1 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Perry. (2011). Lula's Brazil. London review of books. 33(7). 3.24 indexed citations
5.
Anderson, Perry. (2011). Sobre la concatenación en el mundo árabe. New left review. 5–14.
6.
Anderson, Perry. (2008). Apuntes sobre la coyuntura. New left review. 5–35.
7.
Anderson, Perry. (2005). ARMS AND RIGHTS. New left review. 5–40.2 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Perry. (2004). THE RIVER OF TIME. New left review. 67–77.3 indexed citations
9.
Anderson, Perry. (2002). Fuerza y consentimiento. New left review. 5–30.
10.
Anderson, Perry. (2002). FORCE AND CONSENT. New left review. 5–30.25 indexed citations
11.
Anderson, Perry. (2001). La segunda fórmula a prueba. New left review. 5–23.
12.
Gowan, Peter & Perry Anderson. (1997). The question of Europe.38 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, Perry & Patrick Camiller. (1994). Mapping the West European left.34 indexed citations
14.
Anderson, Perry. (1993). Storia d'Europa. G. Einaudi eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Hall, John A., Colin Renfrew, Anatoly M. Khazanov, et al.. (1992). Transition to Modernity. Cambridge University Press eBooks.194 indexed citations
Anderson, Perry, et al.. (1978). Von der Antike zum Feudalismus : Spuren der Übergangsgesellschaften. Suhrkamp eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Anderson, Perry, et al.. (1977). Les passages de l'antiquité au féodalisme.1 indexed citations
19.
Anderson, Perry, et al.. (1974). Intervista politico-filosofica : con un saggio su Marxismo e dialettica. Laterza eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, Perry. (1963). Le Portugal et al fin de l'ultra-colonialisme.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.