Paul Williams
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Frank C. SaccoStuart W. TwemlowMichael WestAnthony FrancisRobert C. DurhamKeith NesbittAmi EidelsRudi Vermote
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (15 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Paul Williams
37 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Clinical Psychology 186
- Social Psychology 116
- Cognitive Neuroscience 77
- Philosophy 74
- Sociology and Political Science 58
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Williams. The network helps show where Paul Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Williams. Paul Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Music in Music Therapy Psychodynamic Music Therapy in Europe: Clinical, Theoretical and Research Approaches | 25 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Balancing Risk and Reward to Develop an Optimal Hot-Hand Game. | 3 |
| 10 | Jones, Roy and Brian J. Shaw, eds. 2007. Geographies of Australian Heritages: Loving a Sunburnt Country? | 1 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Bob Dylan: Performing Artist 1986 - 1990 & Beyond Mind; Out of Time | 0 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | A language for psychosis : psychoanalysis of psychotic states | 5 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | A NEW CONCEPT FOR THE DETECTION OF FATIGUE CRACKS IN WELDED STEEL NODES | 2 |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Paul Williams
Paul Williams is a scholar working on General Psychology, Religious studies and General Decision Sciences, having authored 55 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (15 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (21 citations), Religious studies (58 citations) and Clinical Psychology (186 citations). Paul Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank C. Sacco, Stuart W. Twemlow, Michael West, Anthony Francis, Robert C. Durham, Keith Nesbitt, Ami Eidels, Rudi Vermote, Jos De Backer and Andrew Heathcote. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology and Journal of Vision.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.