Paul Street
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers)Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (2 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Paul Street
14 papers receiving 126 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 73
- Political Science and International Relations 61
- Education 38
- Anthropology 30
- History 18
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Street
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Street's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Street with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Street more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Street
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Street. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Street. The network helps show where Paul Street may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Street
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Street. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Street based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Street. Paul Street is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Empire's New Clothes: Barack Obama in the Real World of Power | 2 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Segregated Schools: Educational Apartheid in Post-Civil Rights America | 15 |
| 11 | Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 | 6 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 143 | |
| 16 | Suffer the Little Kentucky First-Graders. | 0 |
| 17 | The Kindergarten Against Appalachian Poverty. | 0 |
| 18 | Compensatory Education by Community Action. | 0 |
| 19 | Community Action in Appalachia, Unit 9. The "Image" of the Knox County Community Action Program. | 0 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Paul Street
Paul Street is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Marketing and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (2 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (30 citations), Political Science and International Relations (61 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations). Paul Street has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Noam Chomsky, John W. Hamblen, James H. Powell and Mahdi Kazempour. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Educational Research, Phi Delta Kappan and Nurse Education in Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.