Paul Stapleton
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 7
- Motor Control and Adaptation 4
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 4
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 14
- Music top 10%
- Signal Processing top 10%
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 6
-
- Law in Society and Culture 4
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Matthew RodgerMichael GurevichJ. BielyMaarten van WalstijnD.B. BraggRoddy CowieMiguel OrtizMartin Sawey
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Paul Stapleton
36 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Human-Computer Interaction 67
- Cognitive Neuroscience 138
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 128
- Music 19
- Signal Processing 51
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stapleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stapleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stapleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stapleton. The network helps show where Paul Stapleton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Paul Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 2 | Play Make Believe: Exploring Design Fiction and Absurd Making for Critical NIME Design | 2020 | 1 |
| 3 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 16 | Passages from Finnegans Wake | 2010 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 18 | Dialogic Instruments: Virtuosity (Re)Located in Improvised Performance | 2007 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 2 |
About Paul Stapleton
Paul Stapleton is a scholar working on Music, Human-Computer Interaction and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 39 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (14 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (6 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (6 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers) and Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (67 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (128 citations). Paul Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Rodger, Michael Gurevich, J. Biely, Maarten van Walstijn, D.B. Bragg, Roddy Cowie, Miguel Ortiz, Martin Sawey, Marcelo M. Wanderley and Fabio Morreale. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Organised Sound, Psychological Research, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.