Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Polarimetric Observations of 15 Active Galactic Nuclei at High Frequencies: Jet Kinematics from Bimonthly Monitoring with the Very Long Baseline Array
2005393 citationsS. G. Jorstad, Alan P. Marscher et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul S. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul S. Smith. The network helps show where Paul S. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul S. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul S. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul S. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul S. Smith. Paul S. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Corre, L. Le, D. N. DellaGiustina, K. J. Becker, et al.. (2019). Investigating Surface Color Variegation on Near-Earth Asteroid Bennu Using OSIRIS-REx Mapcam Data. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2794.1 indexed citations
Buist, Ian, Steve Potter, Ann Hayward Walker, et al.. (2013). In-situ burning in ice-affected waters: State of knowledge report.11 indexed citations
10.
Boynton, W. V., D. S. Lauretta, E. C. Beshore, et al.. (2012). The OSIRIS-REx mission to RQ36: nature of the remote sensing observations.5 indexed citations
11.
Marscher, Alan P., S. G. Jorstad, V. M. Larionov, et al.. (2010). Comprehensive Multi-waveband Monitoring of Gamma-ray Blazars. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 41.
12.
Smith, Paul S.. (2010). Detection of optical activity in the radio source B2 0619+33. ATel. 2831. 1.
13.
Jones, Tom Dunkley, Julie Bellerose, T. H. Prettyman, et al.. (2010). Amor: Investigating The Triple Asteroid System 2001 SN263. 42.1 indexed citations
14.
D’Arcangelo, Francesca, Alan P. Marscher, S. G. Jorstad, et al.. (2007). RAPID MULTIWAVEBAND POLARIZATION VARIABILITY IN THE QUASAR PKS 0420014: OPTICAL EMISSION FROM THE COMPACT RADIO JET.28 indexed citations
Smith, Paul S.. (1998). Joachim Gasquet, Virgil and Cézanne's landscape: 'My beloved Golden Age'. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 11–23.1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Paul S., et al.. (1994). Ultraviolet Spectropolarimetry of MRK 231. AAS. 184.1 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Paul S., et al.. (1987). "The Painted Witch", Edwin Mullins, New York 1985; "Women's Images of Men", Sarah Kent, Jacqueline Morreau, London-New York 1985 : [recenzja] / Paul Smith.. 12(5).1 indexed citations
20.
Zeilik, M., P. A. Heckert, G. D. Henson, & Paul S. Smith. (1981). Infrared Photometry of beta Lyrae. IBVS. 1995. 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.