Paul Ramcharan
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Safety Research top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- John R. CutcliffeGordon GrantChristine BigbyPatsie FrawleyG. GrantMike NolanJohn KeadyMalcolm Richardson
- Topics
- Healthcare innovation and challenges (21 papers)Disability Rights and Representation (6 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Paul Ramcharan
40 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 441
- Safety Research 394
- Sociology and Political Science 345
- General Health Professions 323
- Education 308
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Ramcharan
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Ramcharan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Ramcharan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Ramcharan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Ramcharan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Ramcharan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Ramcharan. The network helps show where Paul Ramcharan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Ramcharan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Ramcharan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Ramcharan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Ramcharan. Paul Ramcharan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 210 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Models of service delivery | 0 |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | Learning disability: A life cycle approach | 59 |
| 12 | Valuing people and research: the learning disability research initiative - Overview report | 30 |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | Carers and employment | 1 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 117 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 126 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Paul Ramcharan
Paul Ramcharan is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Public Administration and Safety Research, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (21 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (6 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (394 citations), Clinical Psychology (441 citations) and Public Administration (54 citations). Paul Ramcharan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John R. Cutcliffe, Gordon Grant, Christine Bigby, Patsie Frawley, G. Grant, Mike Nolan, John Keady, Malcolm Richardson, Catherine Robinson and Keith McVilly. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research and Ageing and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.