Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
198917.8k citationsFred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi et al.Management Scienceprofile →
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1
19924.7k citationsFred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi et al.profile →
The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research
19882.8k citationsBlair H. Sheppard, Jon Hartwick et al.Journal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation
1985691 citationsPaul R. Warshaw, Fred D. DavisJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyprofile →
Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage
1992600 citationsRichard P. Bagozzi, Fred D. Davis et al.profile →
Trying to Consume
1990546 citationsRichard P. Bagozzi, Paul R. WarshawJournal of Consumer Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Paul R. Warshaw
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul R. Warshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul R. Warshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul R. Warshaw more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul R. Warshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul R. Warshaw. The network helps show where Paul R. Warshaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul R. Warshaw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul R. Warshaw.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul R. Warshaw based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul R. Warshaw. Paul R. Warshaw is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nataraajan, Rajan & Paul R. Warshaw. (1992). Are the Models Compatible For Empirical Comparison? An Illustration With an Intentions Model, an Expectations Model, and Traditional Conjoint Analysis. ACR North American Advances.2 indexed citations
2.
Davis, Fred D. & Paul R. Warshaw. (1992). What Do Intention Scales Measure?. The Journal of General Psychology. 119(4). 391–407.46 indexed citations
Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, & Paul R. Warshaw. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. 35(8). 982–1003.17773 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Sheppard, Blair H., Jon Hartwick, & Paul R. Warshaw. (1988). The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(3). 325–325.2813 indexed citations breakdown →
Warshaw, Paul R. & Fred D. Davis. (1985). Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21(3). 213–228.691 indexed citations breakdown →
Warshaw, Paul R. & Fred D. Davis. (1984). Disentangling behavioral intention (BI) and behavioral expectation (BE) : the latter predicts better. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.