Paul R. Riley
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Surgery top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Oncology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Nicola SmartJames C. CrossJoaquim Miguel VieiraKarina N. DubéSveva BolliniCatherine A. RisebroThomas J. CahillRobert J. Schwartz
- Topics
- Congenital heart defects research (72 papers)Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (32 papers)Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Paul R. Riley
123 papers receiving 6.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Molecular Biology 4.6k
- Surgery 2.2k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
- Oncology 776
- Cell Biology 739
Countries citing papers authored by Paul R. Riley
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul R. Riley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul R. Riley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul R. Riley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul R. Riley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul R. Riley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul R. Riley. The network helps show where Paul R. Riley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul R. Riley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul R. Riley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul R. Riley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul R. Riley. Paul R. Riley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 70 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | Thymosin beta 4 facilitates epicardial neovascularization of the injured adult heart | 2 |
| 16 | Thymosins in Health and Disease: 2nd International Symposium | 62 |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 58 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 193 |
About Paul R. Riley
Paul R. Riley is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 129 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital heart defects research (72 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (32 papers) and Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (4.6k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations) and Surgery (2.2k citations). Paul R. Riley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Smart, James C. Cross, Joaquim Miguel Vieira, Karina N. Dubé, Sveva Bollini, Catherine A. Risebro, Thomas J. Cahill, Robert J. Schwartz, Kenneth R. Chien and Robin P. Choudhury. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.